Skip to main content

State v. Steward

Citations

  • 660 P.2d 278
  • 34 Wash. App. 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert's theory that in his experience most injuries to children are inflicted by mother’s boyfriends has insufficient scientific basis
  • no scientific basis for testimony that live-in or babysitting boyfriends are likely to abuse children
  • no scientific basis for testimony that live-in or babysitting boyfriends are likely to abuse children
  • court disallowed expert testimony regarding alleged propensity of babysitting boyfriends to inflict child abuse
  • court disallowed expert testimony regarding alleged propensity of babysitting boyfriends to inflict child abuse
  • reversible error to admit a pathologist’s “expert” testimony that “serious injuries to children were often inflicted by either live-in or babysitting boyfriends” in the murder prosecution of a babysitting boyfriend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Andersen, Corbett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.