Skip to main content

State v. Stevens

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2974

Syllabus

The trial court did not promise to follow the parties' joint sentencing recommendation of concurrent sentences. Therefore, the imposition of consecutive sentences did not render appellant's guilty pleas less than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We do not find by clear and convincing evidence that the record fails to support the trial court's consecutive sentence findings. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.