State v. Stevens
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2974
Syllabus
The trial court did not promise to follow the parties' joint sentencing recommendation of concurrent sentences. Therefore, the imposition of consecutive sentences did not render appellant's guilty pleas less than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We do not find by clear and convincing evidence that the record fails to support the trial court's consecutive sentence findings. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. RodefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-27· cited 137×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State ex rel. Duran v. KelseyOhio Supreme Court· 2005-08-03· cited 86×
- State v. GilroyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-19· cited 19×
- State v. DowningOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-07· cited 10×
- State v. DoverOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. DehartOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.