Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/7/2024
State v. Stepp
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 914
Syllabus
Criminal. Crim.R. 11-Knowing, intelligent, voluntary plea. Because we cannot conclude, after considering the totality of the circumstances, that the defendant's guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, or that the trial court erred in the acceptance of the pleas, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1979-11-14· cited 195×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State v. LeonhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-16· cited 33×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.