State v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that, under the facts of the case, \one who steals property cannot be convicted of receiving or retaining the same property\
• stating that larceny is a continuing crime in which unlawful possession and asportation deprive the owner of his right to property and its possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reyes
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-07-24· cited 98×
• State v. Martinez-Rodriguez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-09-14· cited 35×
• CARDIEL
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2009-07-01· cited 15×
• State v. Villalobos
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-08-23· cited 14×
• State v. Clark
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-04-25· cited 11×
• State v. Sung
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-03-13· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gonzales
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-08· cited 119×
• People v. Viduya
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-06-24· cited 60×
• State v. Masters
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-10-28· cited 26×
• State v. Tapia
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-04-20· cited 24×
• State v. Duffy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-18· cited 15×
• State v. McKinley
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1924-06-23· cited 15×
• United States v. Abrams
  S.D. New York· 1982-06-21· cited 10×
• Territory of New Mexico v. Harrington
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1912-02-06· cited 6×
• State v. Meeks
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1919-04-07· cited 6×
• Alexander v. Cook
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-06-28· cited 5×