State v. Meeks
Citations
- 25 N.M. 231
- 180 P. 295
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Larceny is a “continuing- offense,” and, if property is stolen in one county and taken by the thief into another, he is g-uilty of a new caption and asportation in the latter county.</p> <p>P. 232</p> <p>2. It is only when the evidence of ownership of animals depend upon a brand that a certified copy of the recorded brand is necessary to be introduced in evidence. P.» 232</p> <p>3. A verified motion for a continuance, setting- up facts calculated to show prejudice and bias of the regular panel of jurors in attendance upon the court, and which was overruled by the court, presents no facts to this court upon which the action of the district court can be reviewed, in the absence of a showing by way of bill of exceptions of the existence of bias or prejudice on the part of the jurors. P. 232</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where property is stolen in one county and taken by the thief into another, he is guilty of a new caption and asportation in the latter county
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.