Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/7/2007

State v. Stein

Citations

140 Wash. App. 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

refusing to consider an argument that a trial court should have given an unrequested limiting instruction on the use of admitted ER 404(b) evidence
appellate court implied finding where record showed that trial court had actually made it, even though trial court had not explicitly stated that it was making finding
Under the law of the case doctrine, our decision is binding on further proceedings in the trial court on remand
appellate court implied finding where record showed that trial court had actually made it, even though trial court had not explicitly stated that it was making finding
court declined to advise jury that defendant had earlier been acquitted of certain crimes because fairness would require it to advise jury about aspects of the prior trial that would not be helpful to the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.