Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/21/2007

State v. Stein

Citations

165 P.3d 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

refusing to consider an argument that a trial court should have given an unrequested limiting instruction on the use of admitted ER 404(b) evidence
refusing to consider an argument that a trial court should have given an unrequested limiting instruction on the use of admitted ER 404(b) evidence
appellate court implied finding where record showed that trial court had actually made it, even though trial court had not explicitly stated that it was making finding
similar act evidence is admissible under ER 404(b) where the State does not have to prove the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
failure to request limiting instruction \waives any argument on appeal that the trial court should have given the instruction\
Under the law of the case doctrine, our decision is binding on further proceedings in the trial court on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.