Skip to main content

State v. Stanford

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1515

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(B) was based on sufficient evidence. The trial court's rejection of appellant's affirmative defense of not guilty by reason of insanity was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by, among other things, moving to withdraw appellant's prior no contest plea. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's motion for a continuance of the trial. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.