State v. Stanford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant's one-word statement in Korean street vernacular, when considered with the defendant's subsequent actions, was sufficient to sustain a prostitution conviction
• concluding that the defendant’s one-word statement in Korean street vernacular, when considered with the defendant’s subsequent actions, was sufficient to sustain a prostitution conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. JING HUA XIAO
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2010-05-25· cited 13×
• State v. Thompson
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-08-22

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaylord
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-03-14· cited 187×
• State v. Batson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 174×
• In Re White
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-24· cited 123×
• State v. Fields
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1984-08-14· cited 79×
• State v. Pone
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 78×
• Commonwealth v. Power
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-05-18· cited 57×
• Mello v. Superior Court
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1977-02-18· cited 44×
• United States v. Gerald Franklin Smith, United States of America v. Dale Ray Haley
  Eighth Circuit· 1971-06-02· cited 40×
• State v. Sun Na Lee
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1993-08-16· cited 40×
• William Banks v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1969-05-26· cited 24×
• Oyoghok v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-03-25· cited 24×
• Ex Parte Sotelo
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-22· cited 24×
• United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem
  D. South Dakota· 1977-11-08· cited 10×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-10-31· cited 9×
• State v. Mahoney
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-24· cited 7×