Superior Court of Delaware· 12/24/2012
State v. Stallings
Citations
- 60 A.3d 1119
- 2012 WL 7760113
- 2012 Del. Super. LEXIS 554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]owing a vehicle is permitted when the operator is arrested . . . . [o]nce that decision was made, the inventory became necessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herlihy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court· 1987-01-14· cited 1,722×
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-22· cited 71×
- State v. GwinnSupreme Court of Delaware· 1973-01-30· cited 37×
- Lively v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-03-09· cited 21×
- State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-01-18· cited 12×
- State v. MillerSuperior Court of Delaware· 1980-08-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.