State v. Stafford
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1378
Syllabus
Plain error; waiver; constitutionality; R.C. 2923.13(A)(2); ineffective assistance. Appellant waived argument regarding the constitutionality of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) based on this court's ruling in State v. Philpotts, 2025-Ohio-1179 (8th Dist.), when he failed to raise it with the trial court. Nevertheless, the record reflects that the trial court did not plainly err, where the Ohio Supreme Court stayed execution of the Philpotts case pending appeal. Appellant did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel based on allegations that his counsel did not consider or advise him of the Philpotts decision before entering his plea, where the record did not reflect counsel's failure. To the extent appellant argued events that happened off the record, his remedy was in postconviction-relief proceedings and not direct appeal.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1999-03-31· cited 127×
- Loeb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-12· cited 18×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 16×
- State v. RoweOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 13×
- In re S.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-21· cited 11×
- State v. BouyerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-28· cited 7×
- Cleveland v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-24· cited 2×
- State v. PhilpottsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.