Skip to main content

State v. Philpotts

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1179

Syllabus

Having weapons while under disability; facially unconstitutional; Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; right to keep and bear arms; temporarily disarm a person who is under indictment for a violent felony. The trial court's finding that a portion of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), which governs having weapons while under disability, is unconstitutional on its face under the Second Amendment is affirmed. The offending provision of the statute prohibits people who are under indictment for violent felonies — rather than having been convicted of violent felonies — from possessing a firearm. Under the United States Supreme Court's recent jurisprudence concerning the right to keep and bear arms pursuant to the Second Amendment, this provision of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) does not pass constitutional muster because it has no \historical analogue\ in this Nation's tradition of firearm regulation.

Judges: E.A. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.