Skip to main content

State v. St. John

Citations

  • 919 A.2d 452
  • 282 Conn. 260
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dog handler competent to present dog tracking evidence as expert in matter, provided proper foundation has been established
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting witness to testify as expert concerning dog tracking evidence because state satisfied Wilson
  • court properly determined identification procedure not unnecessarily suggestive where, inter alia, police presence not overwhelming, it was unclear defendant was handcuffed and police did not suggest defendant was person who committed crime
  • given that witnesses observed unmasked robber only from side and back, ‘‘it was important for the witnesses to be able to view the defendant as soon as possible while their memories remained fresh’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Noreott, Katz, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.