Skip to main content
· 8/22/2006

Dinan v. Marchand

Citations

  • 903 A.2d 201
  • 279 Conn. 558
  • 2006 Conn. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[b]ecause at trial the plaintiff made no offer of proof regarding the specific substance of the excluded testimony . . . it is not possible to evaluate the harmfulness of the exclusion, if improper, in light of the record’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.