Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/30/2019
State v. St. Amand
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3524
Syllabus
Trial court did not err or abuse its discretion when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress. Based upon the totality of the circumstances, the trial court reasonably concluded that the police officer had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that appellant was driving under the influence of alcohol, thereby justifying the administration of a field sobriety test. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-30· cited 666×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. ClayOhio Supreme Court· 1973-06-20· cited 164×
- State v. OrrOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-02· cited 93×
- State v. SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-14· cited 25×
- State v. GladmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-13· cited 19×
- State v. ShippOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-28· cited 14×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-06· cited 11×
- State v. MobleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-03· cited 10×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-22· cited 9×
- State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.