Skip to main content

State v. Nelson

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 2884

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence. There was a reasonable, articulable basis for a traffic stop based on defendant's driving outside the marked lane however, the trial court did not err in determining that, based on a totality of circumstances, \moderate\ odor of an alcoholic beverage and bloodshot, watery eyes, as well as some ambiguity about whether defendant knew what day it was, did not constitute reasonable, articulable suspicion justifying field sobriety tests. Judgment affirmed. (Tucker, J., dissenting).

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.