State v. Sorrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical testimony was not necessary for a jury to determine whether the defendant’s choking of the victim put her in “substantial danger of death”
• choking and causing the victim to lose consciousness were sufficient to show serious bodily injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Baker
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-10-04· cited 433×
• State v. Muscari
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-07-05· cited 37×
• State v. Griswold
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-08-24· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
• State v. Audette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1970-04-21· cited 23×
• State v. Bessette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-02-20· cited 5×