State v. Bessette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court has “wide discretion in matters of trial conduct and evidentiary rulings”; “order of proof is in the discretionary control of the trial court”
• no abuse of discretion denying rebuttal witness where testimony was cumulative, was not offered to rebut new evidence, and where there was no indication why it could not have been presented in case-in-chief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-16· cited 25×
• State v. Venman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 23×
• Nelson v. Percy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-11· cited 8×
• State v. Noyes, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-01-23· cited 8×
• State v. Sorrell
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-22· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Miner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-10-07· cited 57×
• State v. Neale
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-03-01· cited 38×
• State v. Harrington
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-12-02· cited 30×
• State v. Tatko
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1957-01-02· cited 22×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-12-27· cited 16×
• Verchereau v. Jameson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1961-01-03· cited 14×
• State v. Cabrera
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1968-06-04· cited 11×
• State v. Moquin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-02-05· cited 5×