Montana Supreme Court· 1/3/1979
State v. Sorenson
Citations
- 590 P.2d 136
- 180 Mont. 269
- 1979 Mont. LEXIS 714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “high function” of warrant requirement as included procedural safeguard under right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures
- discussing the “high function” of search warrants—quoting McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 455-56, 69 S. Ct. 191, 193 (1948)
- \The [hot pursuit] doctrine is unavailable to peace officers until a felony has been committed and the suspect is fleeing.\
- \The [hot pursuit] doctrine is unavailable to peace officers until a felony has been committed and the suspect is fleeing.\
- caretaker lacked common authority where her access to the house was limited to enter and perform requested tasks of caring for houseplants and animals in owner's absence
- caretaker lacked common authority where her access to the house was limited to enter and perform requested tasks of caring for houseplants and animals in owner’s absence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheehy, Haswell, Daly, Harrison, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LohMontana Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 99×
- State v. HamperMontana Supreme Court· 2008-08-20· cited 73×
- State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court· 2008-08-20· cited 66×
- State v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court· 2009-03-04· cited 63×
- State v. McLeesMontana Supreme Court· 2000-01-11· cited 42×
- State v. WakefordMontana Supreme Court· 1998-01-30· cited 28×
- Petersen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-06-23· cited 28×
- State v. EllisMontana Supreme Court· 2009-06-05· cited 22×
- City of Wenatchee v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-01· cited 21×
- State v. T. StakerMontana Supreme Court· 2021-06-22· cited 18×
- State v. M. ZeimerMontana Supreme Court· 2022-05-24· cited 14×
- State v. DowMontana Supreme Court· 1992-12-20· cited 10×
- State v. SchwarzMontana Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 9×
- State v. Q. SmithMontana Supreme Court· 2021-12-28· cited 9×
- State v. OsteenMontana Supreme Court· 1985-05-30· cited 8×
- State v. W. CaseMontana Supreme Court· 2024-08-06· cited 4×
- State v. UrziceanuMontana Supreme Court· 2015-02-24· cited 2×
- State v. M. BatyMontana Supreme Court· 2017-04-18· cited 2×
- State v. ClelandMontana Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 1×
- State v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court· 2009-03-03
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 560×
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 468×
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 353×
- Smith v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court· 1971-10-12· cited 249×
- Ex parte BarronSupreme Court· 1947-03-03· cited 36×
- United States ex rel. Russo v. NierstheimerSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.