Court of Appeals of Utah· 8/27/1993
State v. Snyder
Citations
- 860 P.2d 351
- 220 Utah Adv. Rep. 36
- 1993 Utah App. LEXIS 148
- 1993 WL 335166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an arrested police officer was entitled to be read his Miranda rights, despite his admitted familiarity with them
- holding counsel's failure to meet filing deadline for suppression motion was deficient representation
- holding counsel’s failure to meet filing deadline for suppression motion was deficient representation
- determining that counsel's performance was \objectively deficient\ where \no legitimate trial tactic [could] be served\ by counsel's decision, and concluding that \we fail to see how counsel's\ decision \can be explained as a sound trial tactic or strategy\
- \Defendant's admissions during the police interrogation [about his sexual fantasies] were so likely to inflame the jury that we cannot confidently state that defendant received a fair trial.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Garff, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BairCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-04-05· cited 36×
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-09-06· cited 32×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-10-29· cited 18×
- State v. BrandleyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-12-17· cited 18×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-17· cited 18×
- State v. MaestasCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-02-24· cited 18×
- State v. HeywoodCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-08-06· cited 16×
- State v. LovellUtah Supreme Court· 2011-08-30· cited 15×
- State v. KooymanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-05-19· cited 15×
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-01-09· cited 13×
- State v. FowersCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-11-10· cited 11×
- Salt Lake City v. GrotepasCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-29· cited 9×
- State v. FerryCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-04-19· cited 6×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-12-11· cited 6×
- State v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-12-29· cited 6×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2013-01-10· cited 5×
- State v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-08-03· cited 4×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-03-22· cited 3×
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-07-09· cited 3×
- State v. MillettCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-08-06· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 652×
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 163×
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court· 1990-12-07· cited 158×
- State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court· 1992-04-07· cited 108×
- State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-03-26· cited 83×
- A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1991-08-16· cited 69×
- State v. FrameUtah Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 68×
- United States v. Hector Espinosa-OrlandoEleventh Circuit· 1983-06-24· cited 45×
- Salt Lake City v. CarnerUtah Supreme Court· 1983-04-29· cited 43×
- State v. KellyUtah Supreme Court· 1986-05-01· cited 35×
- State v. CumminsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-08-25· cited 35×
- State v. EllifritzCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-05-27· cited 30×
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-15· cited 26×
- Wayne Desire v. Attorney General of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1992-09-16· cited 25×
- State v. MoritzskyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-03-23· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.