Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/29/2025
State v. Snow
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3104
Syllabus
Sulek, J. Trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to request that rape counts, involving separate victims, be severed for trial as the evidence in each case was simple and direct. Counsel's failure to object to nonprejudicial statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument was not ineffective. Crim.R. 8; Crim.R. 14; prosecutorial misconduct; plain error.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 477×
- State v. TorresOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 471×
- State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 386×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. BedfordOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-12· cited 102×
- State v. SteedOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 16×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-05· cited 13×
- State v. SearfossOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-08· cited 8×
- State v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-20· cited 7×
- State v. Norales-MartinezOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-26· cited 5×
- State v. CarswellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-15· cited 5×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.