Skip to main content

State v. Snodgrass

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5550

Syllabus

Res judicata barred appellant's claim that he was entitled to the return of money seized in connection with his 2007 convictions. Appellant did not challenge on direct appeal the trial court's sentencing entry ordering seizure of the money for payment of his court costs. The seizure was a proper execution against appellant's assets under R.C. 2949.15. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.