New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/13/2007
State v. Snell
Citations
- 142 N.M. 452
- 2007 NMCA 113
- 166 P.3d 1106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Some of the factors relevant to whether a reasonable person would believe [they were] free to leave include the purpose, place, and length of interrogation.” (emphasis added) (internal quotations marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Bustamante, Fry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 165×
- State v. NietoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-10-16· cited 123×
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-11-24· cited 87×
- State v. HarbisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-04-10· cited 64×
- State v. ReyesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-01-24· cited 34×
- Armijo v. State Ex Rel. Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-31· cited 32×
- State v. GreyeyesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-10· cited 30×
- Sedillo v. Department of Public SafetyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-10-31· cited 16×
- State v. PollerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-02-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.