Missouri Court of Appeals· 11/17/2009

State v. Smothers

Citations

297 S.W.3d 626
2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1860
2009 WL 3817599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that urine sample could be subject to forgery
finding the dismissal of a two-count information constituted a final, ap-pealable judgment because it had the practical effect of terminating the litigation as charged by the State
finding the dismissal of a two-count information constituted a final, appealable judgment because it had the practical effect of terminating the litigation as charged by the State
finding the dismissal of a two-count information constituted a final, appealable judgment because it had the practical effect of terminating the litigation as charged by the State
dismissal with prejudice is a final order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newton, Pfeiffer, Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.