State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that because Missouri legislature duplicated Model Penal Code provision, legislature intended Missouri statute to have meaning shown in comments to the model code
• upholding conviction because the word “writing” in the Missouri forgery statute includes a law enforcement document such as a fingerprint card

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-10-23· cited 59×
• State v. Smothers
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-11-17· cited 23×
• State v. Pride
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-30· cited 20×
• State v. Phalen
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-11-21· cited 9×
• State v. Skaggs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-04-30· cited 8×
• Thornton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-05-31· cited 8×
• State v. Bledsoe
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-10-11· cited 4×
• State v. Banks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-02-28· cited 4×
• State v. Martinez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-05· cited 2×
• State v. Baker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-05-01· cited 2×
• State of Missouri v. Robert T. Byington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-12· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Murray
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1988-02-17· cited 158×
• State v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-02-23· cited 155×
• State v. Wakefield
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 14×
• State v. Hogshooter
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-09-27· cited 6×
• State v. Patterson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-02-09· cited 5×