State v. Smoot
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 838
Syllabus
Criminal-damaging conviction upheld where state presented evidence that appellant admitted spray-painting offensive messages on door without owner's consent and door needed to be replaced. No eyewitness testimony was required, and property need not have been rendered non-functional. Right to silence not violated by isolated statement by officer that appellant hung up on him. Trial court properly entered nunc pro tunc judgment to correct error in numerical designation and omission of degree of offense.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 405×
- State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-26· cited 274×
- State v. ClemonsOhio Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 234×
- State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-02-18· cited 157×
- State v. LeachOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-12· cited 147×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 14×
- State v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-12-08· cited 13×
- State v. MylesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-31· cited 7×
- State v. GoldbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.