State v. Smith
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 963
Syllabus
Hearsay excited utterance exception felonious assault sufficiency of evidence manifest weight of the evidence. - Trial court did not improperly consider hearsay testimony in bench trial because the defendant's statement to his neighbor regarding who shot him was not hearsay under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule defendant's conviction for felonious assault was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 453×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-26· cited 309×
- State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-27· cited 243×
- State v. DuncanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 165×
- State v. WorleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 41×
- Klayman v. LuckOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-26· cited 19×
- State v. ShutesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-07· cited 9×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-01· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.