Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 963

Syllabus

Hearsay excited utterance exception felonious assault sufficiency of evidence manifest weight of the evidence. - Trial court did not improperly consider hearsay testimony in bench trial because the defendant's statement to his neighbor regarding who shot him was not hearsay under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule defendant's conviction for felonious assault was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.