Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4565

Syllabus

Appellant was convicted of two counts of murder, one count of felonious assault, and two counts of having weapons while under disability stemming from two shootings occurring approximately seven hours apart. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for relief from prejudicial joinder, his motion for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant, and his motion to suppress evidence from eyewitness identifications, the pinging of his phone under the exigent circumstances exception, and the search of his home pursuant to a warrant. Appellant's convictions were not based on insufficient evidence or against the manifest weight of the evidence the jury reasonably concluded that appellant was the perpetrator of both shootings. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial due to a disturbance in the gallery during the trial and, later, based on alleged jury misconduct. Appellant's rights were not violated when the trial court met with jurors before deliberations without appellant or his counsel present. Finally, no prosecutorial misconduct was established. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.