Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/21/2017
State v. Smith
Citations
- 901 N.W.2d 657
- 2017 WL 3585107
- 2017 Minn. App. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that providing aid with knowledge of the principal’s criminal intent is sufficient to satisfy knowledge and intent requirements for accomplice liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Reilly, Rodenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-14· cited 347×
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-09-19· cited 139×
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 98×
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 70×
- State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 61×
- State v. BahtuohSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-12-26· cited 40×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-07-16· cited 37×
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy John HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-04-06· cited 29×
- State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-05-19· cited 25×
- State of Minnesota v. Nisius Dealvin McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-04-08· cited 25×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-01-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.