· 1/5/1983

United States v. Dean S. Hazel, (81-1616), James G. Lott, (81-1630)

Citations

696 F.2d 473
51 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 652
1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

arguably asserting that 34 other members of tax revolt group had not been prosecuted suffices for first prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cecil, Kennedy, Krupansky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.