State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding newly discovered evidence met the first prong because it came into existence after the jury started deliberations
• finding newly discovered evidence met first-prong because it came into existence after jury commenced deliberations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rojas-Marceleno
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 229×
• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-08-28· cited 63×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gunby
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 340×
• State v. Engelhardt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-09-16· cited 145×
• State v. Dubish
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-01-13· cited 92×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-09-24· cited 66×
• State v. Dixon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 63×
• State v. Brice
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-12-12· cited 61×
• State v. Trotter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 47×
• State v. McKinney
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 46×
• State v. Reed
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-12-16· cited 41×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 38×
• State v. Sanders
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-02-25· cited 19×
• State v. Norton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 12×