Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/10/2021
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3997
Syllabus
Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to jury instruction on complicity or for failing to object to the admissibility of cell-tower evidence. Convictions were not against the sufficiency or manifest weight of the evidenced despite the fact that accomplice incarcerated for second-degree murder in Michigan testified against appellant.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 556×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-01-07· cited 307×
- State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-26· cited 274×
- State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-13· cited 231×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.