Louisiana Court of Appeal· 9/18/2015
State v. Smith
Citations
- 181 So. 3d 111
- 2015 La.App. 1 Cir. 0186
- 2015 La. App. LEXIS 1753
- 2015 WL 5480656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Fruits and physical evidence of a crime as well as weapons used to commit a crime are relevant to show the commission of such crime and are therefore generally admissible at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Drake, Welch, Whipple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. DortheySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-09-10· cited 2,087×
- State v. SepulvadoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-01-29· cited 1,964×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-03-06· cited 838×
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-11-28· cited 216×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-10-09· cited 147×
- State v. BruinsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-12-14· cited 116×
- State v. AndrewsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-05-05· cited 44×
- State v. HoltsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-05-17· cited 42×
- State v. PattonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-06-10· cited 31×
- State v. SpradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-11-06· cited 10×
- State v. CrochetLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-05-09· cited 9×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-10-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.