State v. Smith
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4706
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in allowing the State (1) to present testimony from emergency medical personnel about appellant's admission to consuming alcohol prior to a fatal traffic accident and (2) to introduce medical records/testimony concerning her blood-ethanol level at the time of her hospital admission following the accident. No \taint\ from any Fourth Amendment violation precluded the State from introducing testimony from the emergency medical personnel and appellant's medical records. The trial court did not err in allowing the records concerning appellant's blood-ethanol level to be admitted into evidence where those records were admissible under Evid.R. 803(6.) The trial court did not err in allowing rebuttal testimony concerning the drug Ativan and an \alcohol withdrawal protocol\ during appellant's hospital stay. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 132×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- State v. HoodOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-31· cited 76×
- State v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals· 2003-08-05· cited 21×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-03· cited 10×
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-03· cited 9×
- State v. SaundersOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.