Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/9/2002

State v. Smith

Citations

55 P.3d 553
184 Or. App. 118
2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that more recent cases “emphasize the underlying purposes of preservation, in particular, fairness and efficiency”
noting that “ordinary rules of preservation are somewhat more lax when the case turns on the applicability and construction of a statute”
noting that fairness and effi- ciency are among the underlying purposes of preservation
addressing proper interplay between preservation principles and mandate of Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or 72, 77, 948 P2d 722 (1997
addressing proper interplay between preservation principles and mandate of Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or 72, 77, 948 P2d 722 (1997), that “ ‘[i]n construing a statute, this court is responsible for identifying the correct interpretation, whether or not asserted by the parties’ ”
“The problem, of course, is that the cases never have defined precisely what is meant by an ‘issue’ as opposed to a ‘source’ or an ‘argument’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Brewer, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.