Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/11/2011
State v. Smith
Citations
- 247 P.3d 676
- 291 Kan. 751
- 2011 Kan. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘ “To warrant the appointment of new trial counsel, a defendant must show justifiable dissatisfaction’ with his or her appointed counsel.” ’ ”
- \'\To warrant 16 the appointment of new trial counsel, a defendant must show 'justifiable dissatisfaction' with his or her appointed counsel.\'\
- \'\To warrant 16 the appointment of new trial counsel, a defendant must show 'justifiable dissatisfaction' with his or her appointed counsel.\'\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KembleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-09-03· cited 74×
- Lollis v. Superior Sales Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-06-10· cited 56×
- State v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 49×
- State v. JasperSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-07-14· cited 48×
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 42×
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 28×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-07-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.