Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 675 A.2d 93
  • 1996 Me. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a defendant’s argument that statements given after proper administration of Miranda warnings were tainted by a prior Miranda violation where the initial unwarned statements were not obtained by coercive tactics
  • rejecting a defendant’s argument that statements given after proper administration of Miranda warnings were tainted by a prior Miranda violation where the initial unwarned statements were not obtained by coercive tactics

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.