State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the PRRA clearly gives the state attorney, not the trial court, discretion to seek a punishment less than the PRRA requires when extenuating circumstances exist, including when the victim favors a lesser sentence
• “once [the State] proves that a defendant is qualified under the PRR Act, the trial court has no discretion ….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 11×
• Ellington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-11· cited 8×
• State v. Retalic
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-27· cited 5×
• DEMETRIUS SKELTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-07
• MARCOS ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-16
• CHRISTOPHER TAVARIS DEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-08
• Skelton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cotton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-15· cited 311×
• Grant v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-02· cited 287×
• Ellis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-06· cited 102×
• McKnight v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 87×
• Vlahovich v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-29· cited 4×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-22· cited 3×
• Vlahovich v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-07· cited 3×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06· cited 1×