Ellington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-settled that, once the State proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant qualifies as a [PRR], the trial court must sentence the defendant in accordance with the provisions of section 775.082(9
• “It is well-settled that, once the State proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant qualifies as a prison releasee reoffender, the trial court must sentence the defendant in accordance with the provisions of section 775.082(9), Florida Statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DARNELL KENO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-06
• DEVON F. EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-13
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-03
• WILLIAM FENNELL PITTMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-09-24
• Canady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cotton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-15· cited 311×
• State v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 11×
• Brooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-29· cited 9×
• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06· cited 7×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-22· cited 3×