Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 9/16/1986

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 726 P.2d 1232
  • 42 Utah Adv. Rep. 14
  • 1986 Utah LEXIS 873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s request for his wife’s assistance in pawning stolen property, without her knowledge that it was stolen, was admissible under Utah’s crime-fraud exception
  • stating statute on which instruction is based, “properly construed, does not establish an evidentiary presumption, let alone a presumption of guilt”
  • finding evi-dentiary support for jury’s inference that possession of stolen property supported theft conviction when other evidence, including defendant’s inconsistent statements, supported conclusion that defendant had stolen the property
  • finding marital privilege unsuccessfully invoked at trial to prevent spouse’s in-court testimony
  • finding marital privilege unsuccessfully invoked at trial to prevent spouse's in-court testimony
  • “An instruction that simply incorporates the statutory language is unconstitutional when the statutory term ‘prima fa-cie’ is defined as a presumption_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.