State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• grand larceny conviction reversed where the state presented no evidence that the value of the stolen watch exceeded Fifty ($50.00) Dollars
• grand larceny is felony which includes all elements of lesser offense of petit larceny except that grand larceny involves theft of goods valued at fifty dollars or more
• grand larceny is felony which includes all elements of lesser offense of petit larceny except that grand larceny involves theft of goods valued at fifty dollars or more
• grand larceny is felony which includes all elements of lesser offense of petit larceny except that grand larceny involves theft of goods valued at fifty dollars or more; State must present credible evidence establishing each element of crime charged
• grand larceny is felony which includes all elements of lesser offense of petit larceny except that grand larceny involves theft of goods valued at fifty dollars or more; State must present credible evidence establishing each element of crime charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
• Joseph v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-03-13· cited 22×
• State v. Simpson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-11-10· cited 17×
• State v. Humphery
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-05· cited 15×
• State v. Parker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 14×
• Roller v. McKellar
  D. South Carolina· 1989-04-18· cited 6×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Woods
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-06-06· cited 3×