Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 652 N.W.2d 546
  • 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1195
  • 2002 WL 31300838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exclusionary rule should only be used when its deterrent value outweighs social costs of excluding probative, but illegally obtained evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Minge, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.