Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2166

Syllabus

Res judicata barred appellant's successive application for expungement. The trial court could have also reasonably concluded that appellant, a former police officer, should not have his conviction expunged because he failed to perceive conduct that resulted in his arrest and conviction as threatening and minimized the behavior. Judgment affirmed. (Epley, P.J., dissenting.)

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.