Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1/19/1955
State v. Small
Citations
- 99 N.H. 349
- 111 A.2d 201
- 1955 N.H. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the rule of ejusdem generis “is neither final nor exclusive” and serves only as a tool — not an edict — in ascertaining legislative intent
- explaining that ejusdem generis “is always subject to the qualification that general words will not be used in a restricted sense if the act as a whole indicates a different legislative purpose in view of the objectives to be attained”
- noting that “the rule of ejusdem generis is neither final nor exclusive and is always subject to the qualification that general words will not be used in a restricted sense if the act as a whole indicates a different legislative purpose in view of the objectives to be attained”
- “As an aid in determining legislative intent, the rule has been employed in this state unless a broader construction is necessary to give effect to the legislative meaning.” (citation and quotation omitted)
- construing RL 170:39, the precursor to RSA 179:5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kenison, Blandin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
- Owen of Georgia, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Shelby County Roy Nixon, Mayor of Shelby County Pidgeon-Thomas Iron Company, Cross-AppelleesSixth Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 74×
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-11-13· cited 47×
- Hickingbotham v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-07-24· cited 26×
- State v. HodgkissSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-11-16· cited 20×
- Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-06· cited 18×
- Houck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-04-25· cited 14×
- State v. BeckertSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-11-18· cited 11×
- State v. RoyalSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-05-31· cited 10×
- State v. Tin YanHawaii Supreme Court· 1960-08-02· cited 9×
- In re D.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30· cited 9×
- Granite State Grocers Ass'n v. State Liquor CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-03-07· cited 8×
- In Re DtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30
- State of New Hampshire v. Bruce MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-06-10
- State of New Hampshire v. Shane M. Beattie & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-11-19
- In re J.H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2023-11-14
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.