Skip to main content

State v. Small

Citations

  • 99 N.H. 349
  • 111 A.2d 201
  • 1955 N.H. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the rule of ejusdem generis “is neither final nor exclusive” and serves only as a tool — not an edict — in ascertaining legislative intent
  • explaining that ejusdem generis “is always subject to the qualification that general words will not be used in a restricted sense if the act as a whole indicates a different legislative purpose in view of the objectives to be attained”
  • noting that “the rule of ejusdem generis is neither final nor exclusive and is always subject to the qualification that general words will not be used in a restricted sense if the act as a whole indicates a different legislative purpose in view of the objectives to be attained”
  • “As an aid in determining legislative intent, the rule has been employed in this state unless a broader construction is necessary to give effect to the legislative meaning.” (citation and quotation omitted)
  • construing RL 170:39, the precursor to RSA 179:5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenison, Blandin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.