Skip to main content

State v. Max Wilson

Citations

  • 159 A.3d 859
  • 169 N.H. 755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a statute can be impermissibly vague if it “fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand the conduct it prohibits” (quotation omitted)
  • relying upon legislative statement of purpose articulated in session law to interpret unambiguous statutory language
  • “[A] statute will not be construed so as to lead to absurd consequences.”
  • “A statute can be impermissibly vague for either of two independent reasons: (1) it fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand the conduct it prohibits; or (2) it authorizes or even encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hicks, Dalianis, Conboy, Lynn, Bassett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.