Skip to main content

State v. Sloan

Citations

  • 912 S.W.2d 592
  • 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1755
  • 1995 WL 619892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the trial court erred in prohibiting the defense’s expert witnesses from testifying about suggestive interview techniques used by the detectives when questioning the victim
  • error to exclude expert testimony that questions used to examine child were inappropriate
  • “However, the crux of [the expert’s] testimony was intended to show that a substantial portion of the questions asked by [the detective] ... were ‘inappropriate.’ This represents evidence only an expert could give on matters not within the knowledge of a juror.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.