Skip to main content

State v. Slater

Citations

  • 644 S.E.2d 50
  • 373 S.C. 66
  • 2007 S.C. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant was not entitled to a self-defense charge where the record showed the defendant was the first aggressor and was, therefore not without fault in bringing on the difficulty
  • stating \the [ Burriss accident] analysis is equally applicable in determining if a defendant in unlawful possession of a weapon is entitled to a charge on self-defense\
  • stating the mere unlawful possession of a firearm, with nothing more, does not automatically bar a self-defense charge, but rejecting the position that the unlawful possession of a weapon could never constitute an unlawful activity that would preclude the assertion of self-defense
  • “To establish self-defense in South Carolina, four elements must be present: (1) the defendant must be without fault in bringing on the difficulty; (2
  • “Any act of the accused in violation of law and reasonably calculated to produce the occasion amounts to bringing on the difficulty and bars the right to assert self-defense.” (quoting State v. Bryant, 336 S.C. 340, 345, 520 S.E.2d 319, 322 (1999))
  • Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 13 at 31

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.