Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 11/15/2002
State v. Sivo
Citations
- 809 A.2d 481
- 2002 R.I. LEXIS 211
- 2002 WL 31599799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that defendant’s statement “was admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) of the Rhode Island Rules of Evidence, providing that a party’s own statement offered against him is not hearsay”
- “A trial justice’s evidentiary rulings during cross-examination will be disturbed only in situations in which an alleged abuse of discretion caused prejudice to the moving party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Lederberg, Flanders, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Charles PonaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-05-23· cited 40×
- State v. VerrecchiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-08-23· cited 19×
- Paul Oden v. Carl Schwartz, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-05-16· cited 18×
- State v. DrewSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-04-18· cited 17×
- In Re Miguel A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2010-03-25· cited 12×
- State v. Marcus HuffmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-06-26· cited 9×
- State v. Thomas H. MatthewsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2015-04-02· cited 8×
- State v. JimenezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-06-24· cited 6×
- State v. Wilson RodriguezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2015-03-09
- State v. Christopher JimenezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2022-06-29
- State v. Tony ReverdesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2023-06-20
- State v. Victor TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2024-04-22
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.