State v. Charles Pona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the prosecutor’s reason was not “facially implausible or unpersuasive so as to compel a finding that it was pretextual”
• “Upon - 33 - such a showing [of purposeful discrimination], the burden shifts to the prosecution to articulate its race-neutral reason(s) for challenging that particular juror.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).