Mississippi Supreme Court· 10/14/1981
State v. Sistrunk
Citations
- 404 So. 2d 564
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Defendants in no way protested or objected to continuances or even requested trial therefore motion to dismiss was premature
- Defendants in no way protested or objected to continuances or even requested trial therefore motion to dismiss was premature
- defendant failed to object to continuances and failed to assert his right to speedy trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Adams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-06-19· cited 112×
- Flores v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 103×
- McGee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-10· cited 56×
- Nations v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 54×
- State v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-12-21· cited 29×
- Moore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 18×
- Brady v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 15×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.